No sense of
consequence
The motivations
behind certain actions just escape me, whether it is for clicks on social media
or personal thrills, a communal and societal pact seems to have been broken.
That awareness of
action and consequence is lost in a reckless belief that there is no one to
hold you accountable and no time for anyone to investigate the situation.
Two incidents have
brought the law into the lives of some thrill-seekers with far-reaching
implications.
Even with the advent
of TikTok, which can produce useful content with a bit of imagination,
malevolence for laughs and shockability appear to be more attractive. The lure
of going viral is irresistible.
No concern at all
For example, two
teenagers are facing the law at Stratford Magistrate Court because they threw a
large seat off the top floor of a crowded shopping mall as an internet prank,
which did go viral.
When confronted and
questioned by the police, the boy who threw the seat said, "It's not that
deep, it did not hit no-one.” [BBC News: Boy admits
throwing seat off Westfield's top floor]
While there is a real
chance that if the seat had hit someone, it could have caused serious injury or
death, we might be getting ahead of ourselves. The key question is why the boys
believed they could achieve anything by hurling a large seat off the top floor of
a shopping centre, whether it was crowded or not.
What kind of pastime
could have occupied their minds enough to dissuade them from such an act? We
may never get the answer, but there is no reason why they should escape
punishment for this egregious act, which showed a complete lack of
understanding of the harm it could cause innocent people in a public space.
A chop for gaol
Additionally, as for escaping
punishment, two men have just received four years and three months each for
cutting down a tree.
Just a tree, but that
tree—the Sycamore Gap
tree—is a renowned sight, over a century old and near Hadrian’s Wall in
Northumberland. [The
Guardian: Two men behind ‘senseless’ felling of Sycamore Gap tree jailed for
more than four years]
Their quest for
notoriety, recorded on a mobile phone as one used a chainsaw to fell the tree
in minutes, shows they travelled 40 minutes at night, then walked through a
storm for another 20 minutes from a car park to conduct this pointless act.
What kind of thrill
could they have been seeking in their apparently restless lives that this tree
became their target for reckless vandalism? Though in court, before turning
against each other, they acknowledged that what they had done was being covered
in the news.
The importance of
community
Despite any
mitigation that might temper justice with mercy, many seem unable to foresee
the consequences of impulsive actions, showing a lack of deep thought about our
deeds.
Furthermore, there is
little consideration of how our actions might impact, offend, upset, or harm
others. This reflects a selfish society.
If only there were a
sense of community in these individuals’ minds, perhaps they would have
realised their actions were wrong and chosen to find another way to contribute
positively rather than to harm.
The point is
recognising others, like not littering, keeping noise down in residential areas
at night, wearing headphones on public transport, or avoiding reckless stunts
on the main road—are fundamental signs of respect.
Surely, there is an
unwritten code of conduct, learned at home and reinforced at school, based on
the simple principle of treating others as you wish to be treated.
Maybe it is asking
too much of that African proverb, “A child not embraced by the village will
burn it down to feel its warmth.” What price some pay for that need for warmth,
which can often lead to the unnecessary heat of judicial retribution.