London, Nigeria
Ikhide
Ikheloa, most affectionately known as Pa Ikhide on social media was
visiting the UK from the US, he said he would attend, and we all started taking
‘selfies’.
According to the programme, this was going to be welcome address, a keynote speech and a book review session. The book reviewer was going to be Funmi Iyanda and other panellists included Ikenna Azuike and Humphrey Hawksley.
The time in Africa
The event was
scheduled to run from 11:00AM to 4:00PM and one could easily notice that this
was a slick operation of preppy interesting extrovert Nigerians with the clear
optimism that they could do a lot for Nigeria, and I am met many Nigerian
youths in other forums I respect for their ability, drive, activities,
intellect and much more.
Considering my
engagement in the Nigerian social media space, I was quite surprised that I
have never encountered any of this team on Twitter, Facebook or through blogs
before, it was almost as if, where have they been hiding? Unfortunately,
despite the number of times came up during the event, I am either suffering
mild amnesia or much else was quite forgettable.
The detail matters too
A few general observations, for an event starting at 11:00AM, much as the ushers and the team were quite welcoming, we arrived at 10:45AM and apart from signpost arrows to the Lecture theatre, the registration table was not ready, the event posters were not up and when I chatted to one usher putting up the signs, the location of the toilets was not known and nor the layout of theatre where there was both a front and back entrance – as signs only covered the front.
My view was once
the session started, new arrivals were to be ushered in from the back, and it
did not matter in the end. The UCL usually offers conferences in their
buildings temporary access to their wireless network, but the information
offered by the organisers was quite garbled that we all had many questions
afterwards for a straightforward process.
When we took our seats, our desk tops were plain, over time as the ushers organised themselves, there was a pledge form (I turned it over as soon as I read it), then a sponsors pamphlet, a flyer of Nigeria Dialogue activities and then membership registration form in that order, but no programme schedule, that was on the main screen and unreadable from the third row where I say, besides, it was quite different from the schedule I applied to attend.
Not all are networking extroverts
In any case, when
the event start and just a few minutes late, the opening remarks led to a
40-minute networking session, which for the extrovert is probably exhilarating
though I do wonder why such people think extroversion should be the default
temperament of Nigerian’s especially in settings like that, I am a naturally
shy person and there were quite a few around like me, that I did extend myself
beyond my comfort zone to chat to some of them.
Others were quite animated in their engagements and as that ended some of us were put on the spot to tell of whom we met and what we had learnt of them. I would rather not comment on my views of that kind of assertive domineering complex, but there were a number of times where from stranger host to stranger guest, the need to wrestle control of the attendees could have been done with finesse. Alas! Towards, the end, words failed me at the decorum from the speaker when he was seeking decorum of the audience. Anyway.
What they do
During the
networking session, we were approached by one of the Nigeria Dialogue who in
his introduction immediate assumed we might have been apprised of ND services.
A list that included policy development, leadership and development, community
development, data analysis, monthly newsletter and election monitoring tool.
For all the time I
followed the recently concluded Ekiti State election, I saw no sign of this
tool being referenced or talked about on social media and the process described
was quite far from reality during polling.
I forget the detail
and none of this stuff they seemed to be doing though laudable, I must say it
is, had before the talk come up in my radar, but after an interesting torrent
of policy wonk spiel, my friend and I glanced at each expressionless, nothing
more to say about that.
Palm to face
The event started
proper with panellists called on stage and another particular attention to
detail missed, in ensuring all the panellist were really present and the proper
pronunciation of names, these are little aspects of pedantry that I fear a
person with very low-spectrum autism would notice and it grates.
The moderator said
we were operating under the Chatham House Rule,
which was to allow for freedom of expression without attribution, if
information gathered from that event were to be used by any of the
participants.
Then each of the
panellists introduced themselves, and on prompting offered a view of their
concept of Nigeria, what their hopes were, what their fears were and ideas as
to how to tackle the issues facing the country.
Why I was there
Broadly, we engaged and interacted on issues of leadership, education, incentives, the common issues, the analysis paralysis that greets all things Nigerian, some ideas bordering on fantasy, others divorced from a historical context, yet in general interesting and useful if this all goes beyond people wanting to hear the sound of their voices.
The most
interesting part for me was in the book reading and the book review, there was
much more to take away from it than the rest as I saw it to the end.
Whether we had a
proper dialogue is probably a matter of interpretation, but moderators need to
be more attentive observing a broad eager audience to give more people the
opportunity to speak rather than return to the same people in the audience to
proffer on the different topics discussed, this happened quite a few times,
very unfortunate.
We still believe
The event drew to a
close and maybe what I took away from it was, regardless of how long we have
been away from Nigeria, we are quite passionate about our country, if we had
enthusiastic septuagenarians in the audience, there is much hope that we would
not all be consumed with cynicism.
A poll suggested
that our democratic experiment as it is presently composed and operating is not
working for Nigeria. There is a need to focus on particular issues to tackle
the Nigerian problem.
Nigerians no more
take kindly to being fed solutions from global institutions, reasonable as the
proposals were, I guess we have decided most of the solutions from before have
never quite fitted to our problems and we believe we do have the wherewithal
given the opportunity to create our home-grown solutions that would work and
endure. We have a very strong sense of pride.
Much as I had
opinions on many of the issues discussed I feared that a narrative had taken
hold looking like group-think, the voiced opinions were rehashing the already
made points, sometimes self-aggrandising and definitely, not fresh.
Maybe next time
On the pledge form
landing first on my desk with me present, I guess that was a faux pas, all the documentation for the
event should have been in a folder or already on the desks before the
participants arrived.
There is much that
would persuade me to support Nigeria Dialogue activities and I hope when I do
attend another, these matters would have been addressed that I would have no
hesitation in signing up to their cause. For this first impression, I have been
informed, nothing more than that.