Cutting the cord means survival
The first umbilical
cord by nature and for the preservation of life needs to be cut at birth; it is
the time when the newly born baby has to begin a life of reflexive independence
to breathe on its own and to take in food usually in form of milk to thrive.
However, that
umbilical cord is the easiest to cut, there are many more that bind us to our
parents or guardians, our communities, our societies, our beliefs and much else
which should when the fullness of time is come be cut or the birthed will
suffer a form of death – a death of freedom, a death of expression, a death of
happiness, a death of ambition, a death of hope – too many deaths whilst still
alive and it might breed resentment, despair, rebellion or depression – it mimics
the cycle of life.
The point in time
At the point when a
baby stops being a foetus, that umbilical cord is cut; just as when a child
stops being a baby, when an adolescent stops being a child or when an adult
stops being an adolescent – that is would be the ideal path of growing up but
it is rarely the case.
The responsibility
relationship between guardian and ward is dynamic, between them the cutting of
the umbilical cord is a function of age, individuality, expression,
responsibility and sometimes success which could determine the leeway one will
give the other to be better at what they are on the way to becoming.
The last cut
The most difficult
umbilical cord to cut is that where the guardian has to accept that their ward
has come of age, where the parent appreciates their child has become an adult
and should be given the opportunity to learn their own lessons, live their own
lives and chart their own courses.
Obviously, guidance
and advice is useful but instruction and diktat is unhelpful; the atmosphere in
which the child has been schooled in the home will however become the
foundation of the confidence, the self-esteem, the determination and the drive
that child has like it did when it ventured its first breath at birth and
performed the first suckling reflex to take in food.
Taking places
At a point in time,
the parent or guardian will have to be put in their place, not so much to be
put down but to be respectfully made to understand that certain decisions are
now out of their hands and their influence is at best advisory and nothing
more.
Along the line,
between agreement and conflict whilst growing up we also encounter the more
difficult elements of gaining our individuality. Expectations are high,
criticisms are rife and praise is rare, punishment is severe sometimes to the
point of brutalisation and power is wielded with deathly omnipotence that it
feels easier to walk through prison walls than extricate oneself from parental
overreach.
Parents do
overreach and in the process attempt to blackmail their children thinking their
parental responsibility required of them by society to provide the basics of
protection, food, shelter, clothing, education and good example is the fullest
expression of love without accounting for the deeper emotional needs of the
child which will never be met with things.
Tough love facts
We did not ask to
be born, but we have been born and there should be more times in our lives that
we are grateful to have been born, to have the parents we have had and to have
had the care and affection that they have showered on us from when we were
hopefully bundles of joy at birth through when they patiently tolerated with
exasperation their inability to control the child who is still under their
roofs.
However, we return
to the matter of umbilical cords or in other parlance apron strings. Children
are not clones they are unique personalities moulded by the environments in
which they grow, interact, find safety, experience abuse, feel love, witness
hate, find acceptance and know rejection – we are moulds of situation and
circumstance that are subject to the casts provided by those whose responsibilities
we were in our formative years.
The path to acceptance
The healthiest
relationships between parent and child will only find fulfilment when they all
channel the Kübler-Ross
model, which first studied the five stages of grief.
Denial comes with the guardian not believing that
the child has come of age, there is anger
that the child is not conforming to expected norms, there is bargaining as to how to regain the best
control and influence over the child, then depression
coming with unfulfilled promise or sadness that a situation might have become a
lost cause and then finally, acceptance
– accepting who the child has become; an adult with their lives, their goals,
their purpose and their own decisions.
The point of
acceptance is when the parent begins to respect that child and honour that
child with guidance and advice rather than instruction, coercion and blackmail –
the healthiest relationships will bring better communication, deeper
interaction, more happiness and a glad heart for that parent as they approach
their waning years.
It’s you or them
If the parent will
not wise up to that necessity, then the child will at a certain point in time have
to be respectfully forthright, frank, direct, honest and true – they will
eventually have to find words to say, “I want to be able to live my live as a
person, unique, independent, fulfilled and appreciative of you out of
recognition of who you have been in my life.”
Acceptance or frank
expression on the side of the either the guardian or the ward is that umbilical
cord cut for the relationship to thrive. If you have not cut it yet, consider
how better things can be if that realisation first dawns on you and then you
make them see the light.
2 comments:
Good Morning Mr @forakin, just read your blog and I think its quite tricky to know when to cut the cord, may be when the child get married. However some parents may be over protective and may not want to let go easily but with understanding the Children should make their point known of when to get loose. Thanks for sharing. Hope you update your blog profile to reflect the fact that you are back in UK now...:)
Whilst marriage can be a breakpoint, I doubt it is clear cut as to whether marriage provides that opportunity.
More pertinently, in the case of children who do not subscribe to the societal norms of partnership are they permanently bound by umbilical cords?
Maturity should be the test and it should not be measured by the act of marriage or the assumption of typical responsibilities.
I have updated my profile accordingly.
Post a Comment
Comments are accepted if in context are polite and hopefully without expletives and should show a name, anonymous, would not do. Thanks.