For each, a pleasure
A friend shared a
profile of his with me which made for intriguing reading until I happened upon
a phrase, I was unfamiliar with. With more information at my fingertips than I
could care to absorb in a microsecond, I tapped in the ‘girlfriend experience’
and a new world of knowledge without prejudice was opened to me.
Not one to moralise
about vices as I cannot say I have that many virtues, even as one strives to be
more virtuous, the offer of intimacy with emotional accoutrements for an agreed
transactional value satisfies a universe of purveyors and patrons that cannot be
ignored, if consent rather than duress initiates the purpose of the rendezvous.
Invariably, there should be no shame in having the talent to share and seeking the
talent to explore rather than exploit.
On the matter of ‘girlfriend
experience’ of which it is an expression, a film, and a television series, even
for the limited period in which that experience exists with one patron before
another seeks it, it can only be hoped that the value of it which for my friend
would be as cerebral as it is physical and rewarding will be repeated with more
generosity than before.
Much as there can be
a gender specification like ‘boyfriend experience’, it would appear the ‘girlfriend
experience’ applies to all manner of companionship of that genre, it evokes a more
fulfilling expectation than can be said for the less salubrious male determined
version.
Stirring up the wrong
sugar
Then to my long-running
polemic about Frankenstein sugars. These are artificial sweeteners not derived
from sugar cane or beetroot. I had decades ago taken to reading the labels on
drinks and foods to ensure these sweeteners did not become part of my diet. Anything
that suggests diet, no sugar, or low calorie, almost definitely has a different
kind of known sugar in it.
In my ‘The rise of
the Frankenstein Sugars’ blog of 2007, I wrote of the many sweeteners I have
avoid whilst failing to wean myself off sugar. I had discovered through the
process of elimination that some sweeteners trigger severe migraines, though accidental
ingestion may not be a direct cause, new knowledge guides my adjustments.
The other day, I
walked into a shop for a bottle of cranberry juice which is supposed to be
ameliorative for the water infection I recently had. There was one with Stevia, a sweetener and sugar
substitute derived from plants.
Peradventure a
mistake indeed
Plants would have
suggested its natural providence, but on tasting the juice, I did not have more
than a glass, before I emptied the bottle down the sink after a week of it
squatting with mendicancy in my fridge. Indeed, I have worked on eradicating the use
of sugar in my beverages, I rarely have it in coffee which should be milky and
not in tea when served in a restaurant or in a café.
I need to work on the
guilty pleasures at home, honey replacing sugar is an indulgence and agave
syrup doing the same is probably a cry for help where you’re marooned far away
from civilisation. Evaporated milk in tea or coffee is a sin I indulged with
the use of coffee milk when I lived in the Netherlands. I can only wonder how
many pounds I might shed if I made sugar haram.
Stevia is sweet, but
that is where the praise ends, the aftertaste is bland and forgettable, just a
few degrees from sickly, you cannot have a tongue with taste buds and think
Stevia is the future of sweetness. If I were to close the chapter on Stevia,
Yuck, will be the last word of the three same words I repeat at the end. Each
with their own exclamation mark. I regret that foolish adventure each day I
remember my tongue was assaulted by it.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments are accepted if in context are polite and hopefully without expletives and should show a name, anonymous, would not do. Thanks.