It would usually happen, technologies that overlap, strong expertise in the separate technologies that seep into egotistical posturing, then exacerbated by a very political setting that engenders silos of indifference whilst all working for the same organisation.
What you get is a
tinderbox of conflict and reverberation played out in emails with escalating
intransigence as more and more people who already have enough trouble to deal
with are drawn into it with the hope that one would prevail and other is
vanquished.
Yet, I do not indulge
in these power plays and that is what it sometimes demonstrates to gain any
particular benefit than to see that what in my reasonable professional opinion
gets done. This is where communication, clarity, persuasion, courtesy, and
evidence matter. I will not propose without the supporting documentation and
references to buttress the point.
The compelling urge
to respond
Then, I rely on the
reasonableness of my argument to eventually persuade those who can engage to
facilitate the necessary. After a number of exchanges, a response came back
that left me quite exasperated. Having conceded that the viewpoint was
acceptable the rest bordered on infantile invective.
I could have
immediately replied, but I could see no further need to conduct that
conversation, I left it to my managers to take to the next level and that is
what I asked them to do. Generally, I am no fan of needless meetings that yield
no progress. I would rather just give my managers the information they need to
thrash out the essential compromises and we can get on with what we need to do.
Just let it work
As the email cooled
off for a few days and over the weekend, I had begun to craft an adequate
response in my head that I began to write on Tuesday, I was not convinced of
the need to send it, so, it lay in my Drafts folder.
A meeting scheduled
for yesterday was postponed to today and it was my intention to maintain silence
until when prompted. I could not have anticipated the developments when
concessions were fully made with even more support than we anticipated. All
this arrived at on the review of their systems and realising that our request
was as reasonable as it could ever be.
At their behest we
now have ample opportunity that probably would never have been possible without
instigation, that first went completely contrary and sour to cooperation and
acquiescence. That’s why I do what I do, I am a geek of sorts but it takes a
different kind of political communication strategy to get radical change to a point where it gets the full support of competing interests and eventual
implementation.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments are accepted if in context are polite and hopefully without expletives and should show a name, anonymous, would not do. Thanks.