A petition I could
not support
I was invited earlier
today to register a protest in favour of a British Christian organisation
called the Core Issues Trust that according to them works to help people with
homosexual inclinations reform and realigning towards what might be pertaining
to a norm.
Now, Core Issues
Trust has a lot to say about themselves and that is a valid issue, I also want
to know what others say about them because they are and the premise of their
petition which I do not support is to have the Barclays Bank reinstate the
backing services they have allegedly withdrawn from their putative customer at
the behest of the agitations of certain forceful LGBTI groups.
Core Issues Trust
avers that they are “a non-profit Christian ministry supporting men and
women with homosexual issues who voluntarily seek change in sexual preference and
expression.” Then reinforces the point by saying, ‘It respects the
rights of individuals who identify as 'gay' who do not seek change, and
supports dignity for LGBT persons. It does not support gay "marriage"
- usually considered an "equality" issue, premised on the belief that
being gay is "biological" and is therefore unchangeable.’ [Core Issues Trust]
It is Conversion
Therapy
Yet, when I view the
Wikipedia entry for the same organisation, I see another face of the
organisation, “The Trust claims it is possible to change sexuality and
offers "psycho-therapeutic" conversion therapy for homosexual
behaviour and feelings. Core Issues Trust states it believes human sexuality
in both men and women is a choice; and that sexual preference can and should be
changed. The Trust says it does not consider homosexuality a native human
behavior, but rather a relational or sexual "damage" that causes
"deviancy" that it may be "cured".” [Wikipedia: Core Issues
Trust]
My reading of this is
unequivocal, this organisation is engaged in Conversion Therapy in everything but
name, it is well understood that Conversion Therapy is not only harmful, there
are laws being promulgated around the world with outlaw it. “There is no
reliable evidence that sexual orientation can be changed and medical institutions
warn that conversion therapy practices are ineffective and potentially harmful.”
[Wikipedia:
Conversion Therapy]
However, I respect
the right of Core Issues Trust to render whatever services they deem necessary
as their somewhat wholesome contribution to society whilst bearing in mind that
many organisations involved in sexuality realignment have folded in
comprehension of the reality of what core sexuality pertains.
Freedom to harm
others
Core Issues Trust remonstrates
that this matter is one of religious freedom and from their perspective, it
might be, but I take exception to people and organisations who project their
freedoms as the licence to act according to their beliefs that would
inadvertently or demonstrably harm others.
I see no difference
between their situation and that of hoteliers who provide services to the
public but select their customers in line with their prejudices against the
broad spirit and letter of trade descriptions laws. It is illegal and they get
sanctioned when it comes to the notice of the authorities.
As I have written
before, if you want to limit the scope of your services or influence to a
particular cohort, you have to be in a confined ghettoised community of that homogenous
cohort, the moment your doorway is in the public space, your prejudices would
have to be lost to a liberal clientele.
Find a Christian bank
Whilst I do
sympathise with the loss of banking services to the Core Issues Trust, it is a
matter of reputational consideration that they have also lost the services of
PayPal and MailChimp, they have courted controversy for a while that it
probably does not need much activism to render them a negative customer to consider
a business relationship with. [BBC News: High
Court hears 'ex-gay' ad ban 'a political issue']
On the point that
Barclays Bank unilaterally without notice or consideration withdrew their
banking services, I would quite reticent to think a global organisation like Barclays
Bank did not have extensive and involved processes that put this matter before
panels of intensive debate and analysis before reaching that conclusion.
It made amusing
reading when in their petition they attempted to join issues with Barclays –
Qatari deal of 2008 when the Qataris came to the aid of the bank during the
financial crisis. It was neither germane nor necessary, yet, interesting.
My advice to the Core
Issues Trust who have such high Christian principles is to find a bank that supports
their value system, maybe a Christian bank. Barclays Bank is not the only bank
in the world, and it is not that Barclays Bank has seized their funds if they
do find another bank to provide those services. Petition all you want, the decision
has been made, contest it in court, if you’re so aggrieved.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments are accepted if in context are polite and hopefully without expletives and should show a name, anonymous, would not do. Thanks.