Hard truths of sons
From a personal
perspective I can understand how difficult it must be for a Nigerian father to
countenance the idea that their child is not heteronormative. If it were a
matter of choice or lifestyles, it is likely they might have been different,
but the world we live in is diverse with expressions of individuality and
uniqueness that may not follow the orthodoxy.
When I father
challenged the public acknowledgement of my sexuality as a gay man years ago, I
was directly instructed to come out of the gay world. I had no other
alternative than to tell him without mincing words some truths about my life he
might have been suspicious of or never knew. Until then, I was hiding my reality
from him in the misconception that I was saving him the shock of my person and my personality. [For
Akin – Funmi Iyanda]
From aberration to
acceptance
In the 1960s, I
appreciate the cultural aversion to homosexuality in the UK even as acceptance
of the fact that homosexuals exist and are neither mentally incapacitated nor
deviants. In 1967, homosexuality was decriminalised in the UK, though it took
decades for acceptance to gain traction towards non-discrimination based in
sexual orientation. [Wikipedia: Sexual
Offences Act – 1967.]
When I returned to
the UK in 1990, I did not shy away from who I was, considering I was being
blackmailed in Nigeria. The way I dealt with the blackmailer was to say he would
have to explain how he found out, why were involved for an extended period and
whether he would not be just as exposed and unlikely me with an exit plan, he
had to exist within a homophobic environment.
My son
When my father
responded, he said, “You are my son, I cannot reject you.” Whilst I did not
read that as a wholesale acceptance of who I am, it was conciliatory enough an acknowledgement
that there was nothing he could do about it if we were to retain any form of
relationship. We have developed that filial relationship despite occasional
hiccups.
Dr Doyin Okupe, a
former presidential spokesman for the President of Nigeria today from the
papers finds himself in the same situation of first acknowledging against every
gain in his religious and patriarchal body that his son, Bolu Okupe is gay. The
most important and significant statement he could make was, “He (Bolu) is my
son.” [The
Nation: Doyin Okupe, son in a row over ‘gay status’]
Beyond that, any
discussion by anyone else is an exertion in conjecture and vain jangling. It is
no doubt a trying period for heterosexual fathers, but their homosexual sons do
have their lives to live. I have a partner to whom I hope to get married. I
affections have never had any inclination apart from a homonormative existence,
I accepted myself long before I needed to tell anyone about who I am, even at
work from the 1990s.
A deluge of ignorance
What I find utterly irksome
is the crass and ignorant reportage that masquerades as journalism in Nigeria.
With the abundance of knowledge, expertise, academic material and legal
precedent in many countries not only acknowledging homosexuality but conferring
rights and freedom with the criminalisation of discrimination on the basis of
sexual orientation, we have people who offer stupefying opinions, bias and
bigotry as fact, that I read, “He resides in France where the law allows him to
experiment with his sexuality.” Experiment?
You do not experiment
with sexuality, it is embodied in the person, their expression and their identity,
it is their life and they live it in or out of the closet, depending on the
agency and autonomy they have. We need to banish the concept of lifestyle or
choice from the canon of sexual orientation or we risk being refused access to
societies where the debate about sexual orientation has long passed from a
wedge issue of societal and cultural exclusion.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments are accepted if in context are polite and hopefully without expletives and should show a name, anonymous, would not do. Thanks.