What are you looking
for?
If you could read my
mind, what will you do with the thoughts that you find therein? Will you with your
knowledge of the predictable and already known seek to change the thought
process to suit something else or some other purpose under your own control?
What would you want
to influence by knowing what I am thinking long before it is expressed and
acted on? Why would you want to pre-empt if not checkmate me at a game of chess
having known all my forward moves that you can anticipate them and compensate
for each variation in the way I play?
Cheating at the game
The chess analogy
brings it to the fore, to seek to rummage through my mind is to cheat at the game, the game of unpredictability, of individuality, of uniqueness and
whatever sense of mystery I might have. More so, my thoughts are processed in
the confines of mental privacy, I having the choice of what I reveal and what I
conceal.
Even with an open
book, you can only be on a page or two at a time, you have to flip to other
pages, and the order in which you read the book might give you a story or a
jumble of incoherent writing. No one reads a book by just reading the last
page. You might find out the conclusion from the synopsis on the dust cover,
but what is the joy in that, if you have not followed the telling of the whole
story.
A poor choice of
occupation
In our impatience to
unravel and discover we excuse ourselves from the world of mystery and the mystique
of the person, we lose the element of surprise and spontaneity, the accident of
moments that makes things worth cherishing.
If we were aware that
our minds were being read, I do wonder if we would even be rational or out of wanting
to thwart or confuse, we become impulsive, disconnecting ourselves from thought
to act almost like animals, uninformed of drive, inclination, passion, or
intention, we might be groping in the dark and crash shins against the sharp
edges of glass-edged coffee tables.
The mind is part of what defines our humanity, to inveigle one’s way into the mind of another is to rob them of agency and dehumanise them. Each person does have enough going on in their minds, I would think that the idea of sitting in the limbo of another’s cranial activity must be an ambition not suffused with elegance or achievement.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments are accepted if in context are polite and hopefully without expletives and should show a name, anonymous, would not do. Thanks.