Absent from presence
Amsterdam, and what
comes to mind is the Red-Light District and coffee shops, to the initiated, the
former refers to legalised sex trade and the latter to easy access marijuana.
There is a likelihood that people would visit Amsterdam to observe and experience
that part of the city which is hardly the full story of a city of culture,
architecture, music, and amazing diversity.
Fundamentally,
Amsterdam residents do not spend their lives in sex shops or getting stoned,
there is more to life than that and I lived in Amsterdam for almost 13 years.
Now, I appreciate that when I first moved to Amsterdam, many of my colleagues
did get carried away with the fun at the expense of their purpose for being
there, once the novelty wore out, many had exhausted the goodwill of their
sojourn.
Some of us knowing
what was available chose not to be amenable to the vicissitudes of lasciviousness, regularly invited we did not participate even if we had the freedom and
latitude to indulge with reckless abandon.
Damned either way?
We must however
separate the place from the person, that a person visits a place should not
mean the person defaults to the reputation of the place in its notoriety. People
have discipline, character, and purpose, in the midst of great temptation,
people do have the resolve to resist and not succumb just because the opportunity
and possibility presents.
In the same vein,
there is a need to know the difference between the person and the place by
reputation. Knowing the person and trusting what the person will do especially
unsupervised is to ascribe a modicum of integrity on the person. The person
might be given to mischief and yet be quite honourable and full of
consideration for others. Then by reputation, Amsterdam can be a crazy place;
damned if you do, more damned if you don’t.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments are accepted if in context are polite and hopefully without expletives and should show a name, anonymous, would not do. Thanks.