Passing time on stories
Sweeping through new stories on my
mobile phone as both a form of distraction and maybe disinterest until some usual
clickbait headline catches your eye, you delve into it just to read what is
being talked about.
Much as I am not into celebrity culture,
there is always something to arouse your curiosity and once you have read the
story, it never really ends with the story, as you are forming opinions of what
you have read, you move on to the comments and that is where you get a feel of
reactions to the story.
Comments in the heart of darkness
Reading one such story around a
celebrity speaking candidly about their family situation, the first few
comments that followed were dismissive, vitriolic, nasty, and horrible. They
got me thinking about whether those comments were a reaction to what they had read or
a projection of who they were.
The unnecessary nastiness towards
people you do not know or will ever encounter in life never ceases to amaze me.
How people just need to think ill of others, castigate and excoriate them and
have the considered intention to reveal reprehensible views in these commenting
sections is a mystery.
Saying nothing at all
I am of the disposition, if you have
nothing good to say, say nothing, keep your counsel and let sleeping dogs lie.
Where I have felt animosity toward others, I try to reflect on why I feel that way,
consider why I have been unable to gain a better understanding and perspective of
the person, rationalise the differences of circumstances and hope that it is
not elements of the deadly sins seeking expression in my words and thoughts.
Obviously, there are other matters
that would elicit comment which in my case would tack towards a generalisation
in lessons for our humanity or if I may use football parlance, I got for the
ball rather than the man. You might inadvertently foul the man, but it is
rarely, if ever, intentional.
Finding light in the dark
Maybe, just maybe, it is a personality
trait along with the excess of indolence that drives people to reveal much more
of themselves by expressing views about others. It is that finger-pointing
paradox, with one pointing out and your other fingers at yourself. If you
should have to point with your four fingers and thumbs, it looks like an
outstretched hand, one giving directions rather than an accusatory poise.
I sometimes wonder why I read some
comment sections because they are majorly depressing and do not help the best
of our nature. Yet in the mess of the unwholesome comments are gems of enlightenment
and wisdom, they excite and encourage, hopefully, we catch them early before a
pall of discouragement descends on our view of the other person.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments are accepted if in context are polite and hopefully without expletives and should show a name, anonymous, would not do. Thanks.