Benched and unsubstituted
He reads with a wry smile the many
congratulations that greet the announcement of being engaged in a new role beneath
which is a story generally untold of process and procedure that confers
invisibility and humiliation on the subject affected.
In a similar engagement just 5 years
before, an associate role gave contract terms of 100% billing for client assignments
and where there were no assignments you were benched at 50% of your daily
contract rate. It placed the onus on the organisation to ensure that he spent
as less time as possible on the bench, for they had to find him billable work to do.
That bench rate disappeared from
associate roles after a year, and then responsibilities shifted in radically
consequential ways. Now, he could be on contract but without a client
assignment and hence, nothing to bill; effectively there is no income.
It was not working for him
Without rewriting the general terms of
engagement, the apparent flexibility and fluidity the new construct brings would
be ideal if he did not have to revisit the employment market, it is however
exceedingly precarious, there was a period that engagements fell from 90% utilisation
to 55% utilisation year-on-year that it was prudent to exit that arrangement.
They decided to reignite the associate
relationship recently where the matter of full engagement was discussed at length
and assurances were given that projects abound for him to rotate other full-time
employees out of roles for longer stretches of time. These were convincing enough
to lay trust in the prospect, there was work on offer.
After a presentation and discussion
that constituted an interview, a contract engagement was offered as he was
assigned to a manager who was yet to begin in his role. The scheduled start date
of two weeks time was moved back a week because onboarding processes were ahead of
the organisational line of management.
More snags and frustration
Then the proposed assignments with
clients could not be taken up because they were of a security-sensitive nature
for which enhanced vetting was required and the agency that should have
immediately transferred the security status would only offer to share it and
that would take months to conclude, even as the term of its validity was
running out. This was besides the fact that there was no contracted activity
with a sister executive agency he was assigned to for over 4 months already.
Now, having confirmed that the
assignee had the necessary clearances even if not in possession of the new
sponsor, this should have sufficed, but it took a barrage of pleading emails to
engage that thought process and by then, the opportunities being considered for had
slipped away.
Zero hours with style
Whilst a valid contract without client
assignment seems to break you out of a stretch of unemployment, the critical
element of earning an income is lost in the circumstances such that even the
agency that facilitated the contract has abandoned the contractor in
frustration and resignation.
The many times I have read about ‘zero-hours
contracts’ I thought it was redolent of gig-economy stints, piecework, or
on-call job roles where you were engaged but not guaranteed any work, along
with other strictures that engender such contracts. You never consider this can
apply to technical and specialist roles that pay well on an assignment, but
nothing at all when not assigned to a client.
Some may suggest, you are at liberty
to find other work and return to this associate role when available, it seems an
ideal quite different from experience. The only apparent change to the situation
is he does not have to undergo the interview and onboarding process anymore, he
has everything to be assigned an immediate role, but until then, he is on the
most sophisticated castle-in-the-sky highly remunerated zero-hours contract.
Each hour he is still scanning the job boards to send his CV and a cover letter still applying for a role in mid-December. It is going to be a cold lonely Christmas with little to cheer about if nothing changes soon. Bills due, rent due, what a sordid tale, it is.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments are accepted if in context are polite and hopefully without expletives and should show a name, anonymous, would not do. Thanks.